The Power of Language
A single word is mightier than the sword
Medical standards and safety have been compromised and likely lowered, globally, via the uncontrolled use of COVID-19 “vaccines”. This is profoundly apparent in aviation, which is dependent upon certified health of pilots and air traffic controllers, but it applies globally to anyone and everyone. The system of aviation simply shows and frames these massive compromises more plainly in a real-time, safety critical environment that carries the visible risk of real tragedy.
In May 2021 the European aviation regulator, EASA, stated “that these vaccines are new pharmacological products” but then recommended that pilots and Air Traffic Controllers (ATCOs), “as essential workers, receive the COVID-19 vaccine as soon as it becomes available”. Very little short, and zero medium and long term data about these products existed but EASA knew they carried a risk of thromboembolic (blood clotting) events. EASA even claimed (falsely) that thromboembolic events were mild and usually common to all other pre-existing vaccines. Thromboembolic events are not mild. They are potentially fatal. They have no place in aviation, as EASA and all other aviation regulators well know. The short term data that Pfizer had as a result of their own trials, that it and the FDA tried to hide from the public for 75 years shows large amounts of adverse reactions and events in those trials – more than were told to the public by Pfizer, any medical regulator and the media.
Aviation regulators are totally responsible for their aviation medical certification systems. They cannot defer to another authority, even to their national medical regulator. The ONLY safety valve any aviation regulator in the world has applied to Covid-19 “vaccines” is to tell pilots and ATCOs not to fly or control after vaccination for 48 hours (in the UK this is just 12 hours), and that individual pilots and ATCOs suffering side-effects outside of that period should “consult an Aeromedical Examiner” with no further advice. This self-grounding rule was long-standing and designed for traditional vaccines, not brand new, gene-based mRNA/DNA products. Aviation regulators choose not to do any monitoring of the effects of these products on aviation personnel. No aviation regulator has demanded aviation-specific testing of these products at all. This is not in keeping with the past use of drugs or medicines in aviation.
This bypass of safety has been achieved through a simple and powerful mechanism of (mis)classification of these products as “vaccines”. This argument can be logically simplified into “Language – Medicine – Aviation (LMA)”.
Language – Labelling COVID-19 products as “vaccines” has bypassed safety
When something is called a “vaccine”, it is subjected to the specific requirements of the vaccine regulatory pathway. This is different and less demanding than for “drugs” or “gene therapies”. This has been exacerbated by deliberate fast tracking of Emergency Use Authorisations, Conditional Marketing Authorisation etc instead of full approval. No Covid-19 “vaccine” is fully approved for use. The testing to which COVID-19 “vaccines” have been subjected (or not) is a matter of global regulatory record, discussed in the various MHRA/EMA/FDA/TGA Public Assessment Report documents.
Medicine – Medics have failed to understand these new products and crossed a line
Medics have largely accepted the “vaccine” label and the stated manufacturer and regulator claims of safety and efficacy, both of which have reduced over time, and they have mostly chosen to take these products themselves and then administer them to the wider population. It is now clear that few if any medics truly understood:
these products' nature, mechanisms of action, and the mechanisms' systemic implications in humans;
the limited extent of their testing and what was truly known about them;
the known and unknown risks.
Medics are unlikely themselves to have exercised fully informed consent and patients will have been no better informed.
Proof of this is in the increasing number of side-effects that are being identified and slowly attributed to the products, which include blood clotting, cardiovascular issues, Guillain Barré syndrome etc. This puts medical regulators and wider medical community into a corner: admit that they didn't have full knowledge and understanding when they took the products and gave them to others thereby risking credibility damage and exposure to liability, or stay quiet or find another narrative by which to avoid possible credibility and liability issues.
Had these products been called something else other than “vaccines”, would the world have treated them differently e.g. demanded more testing than was done, treated them with greater caution, and deployed them slower?
The use of one word, label or classification – “vaccine” - has bypassed almost all medical safety checks and balances and seen billions of people dosed with products that have been inadequately tested.
Aviation – no due diligence done in aviation medicine for these products
Aviation has its own aviation medical system and standards. Vaccine safety checks and balances are even fewer than in medicine. No one in the aviation medical world has performed any aviation-specific due diligence on these products before they were administered to pilots or air traffic controllers, who are all medically certified and strictly limited on their use of medical products while working. This is because aviation regulators have:
totally deferred to the medical regulator's stance on their classification as vaccines, and their claims of safety and efficacy, which are now proven to be wrong.
for reasons yet to be publicly explained, deemed it unnecessary to perform their own assessment of the suitability of these new products in the aviation environment, despite being brand new (in whole and in part).
Within aviation medicine, if anything is labelled a “vaccine” it is allowed to be used by aviation personnel with no further scrutiny by the aviation medical system. Conversely, if a product was labelled a new “drug”, “treatment”, “gene therapy” etc, it would not be allowed in flying for years until it had been heavily tested in trial, the population and specifically in aviation.
A single word – “vaccine” – bypassed all safety checks and balances in medicine and aviation and got products that even the manufacturers stated are “gene therapies” straight into the arms of aviation personnel. That's the power of language.
On July 14, 2022, the Australian Civil Aviation Safety Authority wrote to GAAC and stated:
For example, the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines available in Australia have been approved for use by the TGA and are therefore treated by CASA the same as any other immunisation.
A/Executive Manager, Stakeholder Engagement Division
Civil Aviation Safety Authority
p: 131 007
GPO Box 2005, Canberra ACT 2601
The one sentence tells the world how faulty the aviation regulatory system is. Here is a breakdown of that sentence to prove this point:
Aside from the question of whether “SARS-CoV-2 vaccines” are actually vaccines, none have been approved by Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration. They are all subject to Provisional Determination Notices and provisionally authorised for use in humans, subject to specific conditions. The TGA, like all other ICMRA regulators, lists them as Black Triangle label products, which explicitly admits to major limitations regarding what testing has been done, how long they have been in use and what is (or is not) known or understood about them. To claim, in writing, that any “have been approved for use by the TGA” is false and a misleading use of language. GAAC have responded to CASA to point this out with reference to TGA’s own documents.
CASA states that these products have been “treated by CASA the same as any other immunisation”. They are not like any other immunisations ever used in humans before and they are completely novel. They also do not immunise humans against SARS-CoV-2, which is admitted by all governments, medical regulators and manufacturers. No other vaccines have been subjected to so little testing before their widescale use in humans. No other vaccines have been allowed for use in flying after so little testing and widespread use.
They are unlike any previous vaccine and yet they have been treated like any other previous vaccine in every respect. Why?
Just this one sentence from CASA shows you, the travelling public, the depth of the competence problems (and possibly worse) in aviation regulation today.
Australia’s CASA is trying to abrogate its responsibility for aviation medical safety. It is trying to blame the TGA for the decisions CASA made and the complete lack of due diligence it did on these products.
On Feb 3 2022, CASA’s Principal Medical Officer, Dr. Kate Manderson said to Australian airline pilots:
“The vaccines are safe. They are effective. They will stop you from getting really sick. And I encourage you to have your vaccines, and there you are.”
She did not cite any proof backing her and CASA’s assertions. She is the top of the food chain of Australian aviation medical authority and the entire travelling public’s safety that stems from aviation medical safety originates from Dr. Manderson’s position.
At the time she made that statement of certainty, there was large amounts of evidence that they were not safe and not effective. Medical regulators across the globe had formally recognised that these products could make anyone “really sick” and even kill them. All of this makes Dr. Manderson’s assertions less than accurate.
Search these manufacturer documents for “gene therapy”:
Thanks for reading Global Aviation Advocacy Coalition!
That's why I started to write about it. Even a little scientific background would be enough to see through it. That the entire medical community is going along with total redefinitions of what medicine was telling until the covid era, is mindblowing, to me. The consequences of this one word, are enormous, and so the responsibility of those who participate in this crime. Let's just hope those who designed the products, have the anti-dote. The amount of VAERS victims though says otherwise, tragically.
The scary part that pilots that are damaged are right now flying all over the world...putting their passengers and people on the ground in grave danger.